[FC] (no subject)

[Ron]

Why do you assume that it's not supposed to have a positive camber when 
unloaded?
RonH

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <fredbagnall at aol.com>
To: <corvanatics at corvair.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 3:18 PM
Subject: [FC] (no subject)


> OK So they may have changed the spring rates on the 65 and I did buy  the
> right ones from our east coast vendor. But do you have any idea as to why 
> even
> with the proper springs I still have positive camber?  BTW the van had
> positive camber with the old springs also. Thanx  again for any 
> suggestions.
>                               F.B.
> **************AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all 
> other
> Holiday needs. Search Now.
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212792382x1200798498/aol?redir=http://searchblog.aol.com/2008/11/04/happy-holidays-from
> -aol-search/?ncid=emlcntussear00000001)
> _______________________________________________
> Corvanatics mailing list
> Corvanatics at corvair.org
> http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/listinfo/corvanatics
> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America, 
> http://www.corvair.org/
>