[SCG] 1964 Decklid update

[Bill Hubbell]

Even if that is all so, why, oh why would they make the change only 4-5
months before the entire deck lid was to be scrapped (replaced by LM
design)?!!!

Bill


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard W Thompson" <Richard.W.Thompson at usa.dupont.com>
To: "Bill Hubbell" <whubbell at umich.edu>
Cc: <scg-list at tiger.skiblack.com>; <scg-list-bounces at tiger.skiblack.com>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: [SCG] 1964 Decklid update


>
>
>
>
> Since we have no memo from Fisher Body or GM R&D or Engineering to point
> us
> to why the change happened or exactly when it was to be implemented in
> stamping operations, we are all in the same boat in determing the exact
> when and the why. But I would not be so quick to dismiss the thought that
> I
> provided as any estimation by any of us should be considered as to the
> when
> and the why the holes vary in number if there can be some sensical things
> that can be pointed to.