<VV> Re: shocks
Eric S. Eberhard
flash@vicspdi.com
Wed, 04 Aug 2004 12:25:17 -0700
True -- always a trade off. I wanted a "stock" ride so I guess I get
"stock" handling and braking ... which is fine with me. If I really want
excellent ride, handling, and braking, I have several modern cars that
qualify. The difference between a new car and a 40 year old car is
amazing. But the new ones just don't have the fun of the Corvairs. Drove
the Spyder today with top down --> life does not get any better than
that. Even if it does not handle and stop and accelerate like a new car
... no A/C either!
At 12:14 PM 8/4/2004, kaczmarek@charter.net wrote:
> > Eric
>
>IFO would never say don't set adjustable shocks to where you like the
>ride. Just keep in mind that handling and stopping distance increase as
>the setting gets softer.
>
>Regards HANK
> >
>
>
> > I don't really like the bounce test as it depends too much on the
> > shocks. Unless you know how they were new, then you have no real point of
> > reference. I just installed Clark's adjustable shocks on my sedan. At
> > stiff they barely bounce even. At soft they bounce 4 times or so ... I
> >
Eric S. Eberhard
(928) 567-3727 Voice
(928) 567-6122 Fax
(800) 569-1122 Denver Office (I am never there, you can leave a
message)
928-301-7537 -- you may call any time day or night, I turn it off when I
sleep :-) Please try to use a land line first (reception often poor).
http://www.vicspdi.com
Completely updated web site of personal pictures with many new
pictures! Includes horses, dogs, Corvairs, and more.
http://www.vicspdi.com/ourpics/index.html