<VV> 4 Speed Trans and more

BobHelt at aol.com BobHelt at aol.com
Fri Apr 15 02:09:50 EDT 2005


In a message dated 4/14/05 11:05:41 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
Larry at forman.net writes:

> Hi Dan,
> While you might not want to hear this, the 64/65 4-speed is MUCH 
> better.  It would require a new tranny input shaft and larger tranny input 
> shaft seal.  The synchros last a lot longer and it shifts much better.
> 
> -- Larry
> 

Full agreement here with Larry's analysis. But be sure to check out the gear 
ratios of the '64-65 4-speed and see if you like them, since they are designed 
for the 164 cid engine.
Regards,
Bob Helt


More information about the VirtualVairs mailing list