<VV>Standard Trans

[Frank DuVal]

Frank DuVal's comments below:

Padgett wrote:

>
>> WHY did Chevy offer the 3-speed manual as the standard
>> transmission in the '65 Corsa?
>
>
> That is why a three-speed is called a "standard" transmission. It 
> allows a low base price for the car an a stiff markup for a four speed 
> (same as the automatic AFAIR). This was true on all GM car lines 
> (Cadillac made automatic standard around 1955) particularly ones with 
> a "loss leader".
>
> This was so prevalent that GM bought a top loader three speed from 
> Ford for 400+ cid engines (69-70) until the Muncie three-speed was 
> available.


Yes! I have one of those rare birds ( Ford top loader in GM car), my 
1970 Buick Estate Wagon with the 455 ci engine, column shift.

>
> The American three-speed with H pattern has been around since the '20s 
> (see "Springfield Rolls") and is enough for the big, slow turning 
> engines with broad torque bands common in the US. Tax laws elsewhere 
> resulted in small, hig winding engines that needed more gears.
>
> Around 1950, "three on the tree" was considered a plus since it 
> allowed a passenger to sit closer to the driver.


Yes! Note above car. But enough of that talk for now. ;-)   My family 
might be lurking!

>
> Padgett
>
>