<VV> I want an electric sports car -Tesla Motors Roadster!!! (Convert your vair to electric with the drive train)

Ron ronh at owt.com
Thu Sep 14 15:06:19 EDT 2006


Off hand, I wouldn't have much faith in the longivity of laptop batteries 
when subjected to automotive use but this won't be a factor for the initial 
wealthy buyers who aren't likely to keep them a whole year anyway.
RonH

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eric S. Eberhard" <flash at vicsmba.com>
To: <virtualvairs at corvair.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:47 AM
Subject: <VV> I want an electric sports car -Tesla Motors Roadster!!! 
(Convert your vair to electric with the drive train)


> This may come as a surprise to you all, but Tesla Motors is my brother's 
> company, and most of our family are founding investors.  So I am not 
> biased.  Here is my take on the car:
>
> Most auto technology starts with expensive cars and moves down to more 
> pedestrian cars as the cost of the new technology is recovered.  However, 
> in the past, electric cars have been the opposite.  They have tried to 
> build "eco" cars and economy sedans first.  They are way too expensive to 
> actually be an economy car, and to keep costs down they are poor 
> performers in terms of range and traditional performance measurements.
>
> The idea of the Tesla roadster is to fund new electric car technology by 
> starting with a more expensive car.  In the future there will be sedans 
> and coupes with much more reasonable prices for the average person, as the 
> technology filters down.
>
> The car stands on it's own two feet as a sports car -- no matter the power 
> train.  It goes 0-60 in under 4 seconds.  But that is actually a deceiving 
> number.  When a car magazine tests say a Porsche Turbo (3.6 seconds 0-60 
> these days) they make many "runs."  This is to determine the best amount 
> of wheel spin/clutch slip/rev/etc at launch and to determine best shift 
> tactics.  When all is said and done they pick the best number. Of course, 
> all of this is done with professional drivers.  Gasoline cars also perform 
> differently and different altitude and temperature.  Several of the 
> magazine "adjust" their times for these factors.  The Tesla Roadster is 
> much different (I have driven several including my brother's first 
> prototype).  Just plant your foot and hang on!!!  It will duplicate it's 
> 0-60 time each and every time.  The computer handles the launch, and there 
> is no shift point.  The altitude and temp. make no difference (perhaps to 
> tire stickiness?).  In the real world my grandmother in a Tesla Roadster 
> would beat a supposedly faster Vette or Porsche 999 out of 1000 times. 
> The feeling of torque is stunning -- like a roller coaster almost.  It has 
> 100% of it's torque at zero rpm (idle :-) ).
>
> The chassis has strong ties to the Lotus Elan.  There are major 
> differences to handle different weight and weight distribution, as well as 
> changes to improve the passenger compartment.  The Elan is one of the 
> world's best handling cars, this car may be better.  So although some of 
> the skill required for obtaining great 0-60 times, with the power this car 
> has, handling at the limit should take considerable skill and be a joy (I 
> have not been allowed to test this as crashing one of the prototypes would 
> not be good).
>
> Braking is stunning.  Because of the rear engine the weight transfer to 
> the front during braking is minimized, and it stops instantly.  That is 
> why Corvairs stop so well for a 60's car with drum brakes.
>
> It also has all the toys expected in a high end sports car such as nav 
> system, blue tooth, iPod dock to go with the awesome stereo, climate 
> control, leather, convertible hard top, etc.
>
> So someone considering a Vette or Porsche or Viper could at least consider 
> the Tesla on it's performance and luxury merits alone.  As a bonus, in 
> jaded California it will remain a bit unique for a while.  The icing on 
> the cake is that it is electric.  In California this often make it one of 
> the fastest real life cars -- it can run in the commuter lanes with only 
> the driver :-) !!!  In rush hour it'll beat any other "super car."  And 
> people get to feel good about being green.
>
> It is also very cheap to operate -- about 2 cents per mile for "fuel."  It 
> has no oil changes or other drivetrain maintenance issues.  There is even 
> a hookup for solar systems so that the car can be powered by solar and 
> also feed power back in to the home.
>
> The technology is actually rather stunning.  It uses laptop batteries.  It 
> will easily go 250 miles.  My brother routinely drives from Palo Alto (Bay 
> Area) to SLO (Central CA, San Luis Obispo), charges the car over night on 
> standard home circuit, and then drives to LA the next morning.  It uses 
> sophisticated software to accomplish a lot of what it does, including 
> regenerative braking that works behind the scenes (e.g. the driver just 
> drives the car like any other car, the electronics manage the 
> regeneration).  The transmission (which you shift at 65 or so, if you want 
> to bother) uses electronics to match the motor and shaft speeds, avoiding 
> heavy synchros and clutches and so forth.
> If you choose you can just leave it in 2nd gear all the time -- 0-60 is 
> reduced to something just under 6 seconds which is generally sufficient.
>
> I should point out that there are a lot of "cottage" or "niche" auto 
> builders, some that even make electric cars quicker than this one.  But, 
> this is no cottage builder.  This is a real car with real-world 
> driveability.  They have already sold the first 100 cars, and it won't 
> even be available for another 9 months or so.  After they add the sedan 
> (with a factory being built in the USA) they intend to become a "real" car 
> company.  My brother dreams big, and he is thinking "Ford", not "Caterham" 
> or "DeLorean"  as his model.
>
> Anyone interested in meeting my brother or seeing/driving prototypes or 
> whatever, drop me a line. I MIGHT be able to arrange it (he is very busy 
> and the prototypes are often unavailable).
>
> I have had the vague idea of taking his drive train and dropping it in to 
> an early convertible.  It will easily fit, and the drive train weighs 200 
> lbs or so, easy to support.  Because it uses laptop batteries, I can then 
> scatter them about to get good weight distribution.  Sort of a modern 
> interpretation of the electro-vair.  I am probably too lazy to actually do 
> it, but it is a pleasant thought.  Anyone that wants to try, let me know, 
> I can help!  I'll probably end up with a real Tesla Roadster instead.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 05:52 AM 9/14/2006, you wrote:
>>Yeah, I was this on Top gear, I think. It's pretty good looking. And
>>fast. I would have one. I have to say that I like quite a bit.
>>
>>As for my previous statement that most electrics are ugly, I stand by
>>it. I should have prefaced that by saying that I think most car
>>companies are making crap looking cars and have been for years. The
>>current 'vette is less offensive than it has been in the past, but
>>that's about it. The rest of chevy's endeavors are awful. Ford's are
>>twice as ugly. The only Chrylsers I've seen in recent years that i
>>liked are the sebring convertible (pre-2000) and the PT cruiser,
>>although I think they screwed up the front grill and bumper with the
>>last design changes.
>>
>>One, two, three... flames wars begin!!!
>>
>>-Cash
>>
>>
>>On Sep 13, 2006, at 4:52 PM, Sethracer at aol.com wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>In a message dated 9/13/2006 8:18:19 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>>>corvair at fnader.com writes:
>>>
>>>The  majority of folks currently driving hybrids WANT the attention
>>>and
>>>are  drawn to the "different" look of the cars.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>If this is the different look - It's okay by me!  The Tesla
>>>roadster.  - WOW!
>>>_http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in- 
>>>santa-monica/_
>>>
>>>(http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in- 
>>>santa-monica/)
>>>
>>>- Seth
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all
>>>copyrights are the property
>>>of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:vv- 
>>>help at corvair.org
>>>This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America, http:// 
>>>www.corvair.org/
>>>Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
>>>Change your options: http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/ 
>>>virtualvairs
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are 
>>the property
>>of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, 
>>mailto:vv-help at corvair.org
>>This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America, 
>>http://www.corvair.org/
>>Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
>>Change your options: 
>>http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs 
>>_______________________________________________
>>
>
>
> This email sent by:
>
> Eric S. Eberhard
> (928) 567-3727          Voice
> (928) 567-6122          Fax
>
> 928-301-7537 -- you may call any time day or night, I turn it off when I 
> sleep :-)  Please try to use a land line first (reception often poor).
>
> Note the change in the domain from vicspdi.com to vicsmba.com !!!!
>
> For Metropolis support and VICS MBA Support!!!!
>
> http://www.vicsmba.com
>
> Completely updated web site of personal pictures with many new pictures! 
> Includes horses, dogs, Corvairs, and more.
>
> http://www.vicsmba.com/ourpics/index.html
>
> Corvair pictures including the Judson setup on our 62 Sedan and lots of 
> pictures of Cheryl's 62 Monza Wagon and our 62 Spyder convertible.
>
> http://www.vicsmba.com/ourpics/corvairs.html
>
> My little brother Martin has started a very serious car company.  A hot 
> rod (very fast) electric roadster is the first offering.  The chassis is 
> built by Lotus to their specs.  Check it out:  http://www.teslamotors.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are 
> the property
> of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, 
> mailto:vv-help at corvair.org
> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America, 
> http://www.corvair.org/
> Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
> Change your options: 
> http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs 
> _______________________________________________
> 



More information about the VirtualVairs mailing list