<VV> LM Wheel Well Trim - LM-squared = "late-late"

[Charles Lee at Proper Pro Per]

Yup ...

LMs win again, even against early LMs ...


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "airvair" <airvair at richnet.net>
To: "Charles Lee at Proper Pro Per" <chaz at ProperProPer.com>
Cc: "Virtual Vairs" <VirtualVairs at corvair.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: <VV> LM Wheel Well Trim - LM-squared = "late-late"


> Oh, you meant:
>
> "They fit the same shape, but "thin" would be wrong on a 65
> (early-lates), and "THICK" is wrong on late-lates ..."
>
> As in "there is '65, and then there is everything else ('66-9)."
>
> -Mark
>
> Charles Lee at Proper Pro Per wrote:
>>
>> Mark,
>>
>> That's what I meant by "late-lates" : 66-69, whereas the 65 models were
>> unique in the visual aspect of the wheel well trim (among other things).
>>
>> There were many other small differences from year to year (EM and LM), 
>> but
>> the most noticeable on the LM was the difference between wheel trim
>> moldings, "thick" then "thin."
>>
>> (There are also the rear grill and front crossbar and Saginaw 4-speed, of
>> course, in which the 66 through 69 diverged from the 65, as well.)
>>
>> Therefore the newly coined term "late-late" (or LM^2 ?).
>>
>> Chaz
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> Subject: Re: <VV> LM Wheel Well Trim
>>
>> > Charles,
>> >
>> > What do you mean "late-lates"? When it comes to the wheel well trim,
>> > there are only two: '65 and '66-9. There simply are NO others.
>> >
>> > -Mark
>> >
>> > Charles Lee at Proper Pro Per wrote:
>> >>
>> >> They fit the same shape, but "thin" would be wrong on a 65 
>> >> (early-lates),
>> >> and "thin" is wrong on late-lates ...
>> >
>> >
>
>