<vv> Donations, was: Questions

[Mark Corbin]

Now don't get the wrong idea, Matt. I never said those activities weren't
of value. But I think it would be a good idea to DISCUSS and re-examine the
issue, just to be sure that we aren't shortchanging ourselves in the long
run. Money only goes so far, and we've got to make sure we are getting the
best bang for the buck.

Also, to what group are you refering? The only group I head is the Air'Vair
Group, which has been around for about 30 years. So it's YOU that named
your group after US, not the other way around.

-Mark


> [Original Message]
> From: Matt Nall <nalllm at verizon.net>
> Subject: Re:<vv> Donations, was: Questions
>
> You're a Democrat???  Now you want to rob "OUR"  Social Security!! [
racing 
> fund]    Sheeesh!!!! gggg
>
> But then...you did name your GROUP in a way to DIG  at another group  ggg
>
> Me, I would've called the CPG.... "  We don't sleep in our trunks 
> Association"
>
> ps  I'm still bummed you didn't choose " Proposed Oppposed Performance" 
as 
> the name of the  Newsletter!
>
>
> Matt Nall
> All Vairs!
> http://members.aol.com/patiomatt
> Lots of Corvair Technical info!
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> > Question: What's with the scholarship and racing funds? Think about it.
> > Here we are giving away money to a small group of people. Meanwhile, the
> > general club, museum operating, and endowment funds need money. So one
> > might ask if the scholarship and racing funds siphon money away from the
> > general club, museum operating, and endowment funds. Granted, much of
that
> > money when given is earmarked for those funds, but doesn't that
ultimately
> > cut into members' capability to make other donations? The gist of this
is
> > that maybe we need to rethink the purpose of these extraneous funds that
> > serve only a small percentage of the membership, in favor of those which
> > serve the entire membership. A point to discuss.......
>