<VV> Defective Design

[Bill Hubbell]

Sorry, what?  I wrote that so long ago I lost my train of thought.

 

Welcome back to the USA, Seth!

 

Bill

 

 

  _____  

From: Sethracer at aol.com [mailto:Sethracer at aol.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 7:00 PM
To: whubbell at umich.edu; virtualvairs at corvair.org
Subject: Re: <VV> Defective Design

 

In a message dated 3/7/2008 12:10:57 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
whubbell at cox.net writes:

Actually, the Early Model Corvair design was "perfect", which is why they
sold so many of them, compared to the "defective" Late Model design, which
led to the demise of the Mark (double meaning intended).

Bill (tongue planted firmly in cheek) Hubbell

 

Bill - sounds pretty good for your tongue in the cheek - Another thought,
though: If the early model had been a true success in the market, justifying
further investment, Chevrolet wouldn't have had to design the Falcon-clone
Chevy II and the Mustang-fighter Camaro. Remember, the Mustang pre-dated the
late model Corvair! If the Chevy II and Camaro hadn't taken up those roles
in the market, the Corvair might have gone on to more greatness in it's
later model evolution. I guess logic can be twisted more than one way!

 

- Seth (enjoys playing "what-if?")





  _____  

Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch
<http://home.aol.com/diy/home-improvement-eric-stromer?video=15?ncid=aolhom0
0030000000001>  the video on AOL Home.