<VV> Cadet

Thompson, Ed ed.thompson at quarles.com
Fri May 7 09:28:51 EDT 2010


I thought the Opel Kadett of the early-to-mid-70's were kind'a neat.

________________________________

From: Dave Newell [mailto:chevrobilia at juno.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:16 PM
To: bwschug at att.net
Cc: joedarinsig at yahoo.com; Thompson, Ed; virtualvairs at corvair.org;
gswiatowy at rochester.rr.com
Subject: Cadet


Hi Bruce,
I've interviewed Peter about the Cadet. He was in love with the concept
and it was something that we car nuts could have really embraced. But I
think it's easy to infer from the article that Peter feels it led to the
Corvair. I never got that impression from him and I've heard no one who
was at Styling at the time express that thought.

The Cadet was project XP-79 which was initiated in July of 1957, two
months after the XP-76 project for Chevrolet was started in May. The
photo dates in the article and on Peter's sight are wrong...they were
actually shot in 1957. XP-79 had nothing to do with Chevrolet...it was
started by Earl as a Styling project without any  divisional backing, as
was typical of Earl's (and Mitchell's) foresight. The XP-76 package for
what became the Corvair was laid down by Cole and Harry Barr and given
to Ned Nickles in May.

Yes, you can see some Corvairish lines in tail light panel, rear pan and
in the body crease line along the side. There could have been some
crossbreeding done with those by Earl, but you could also say that they
began with the Chevy Biscayne Motorama car, which was close to the
Corvair's size. That tail treatment was in the air at the time. Note
that the Cadet coupe's rear window and C pillar treatment resemble the
'58 Impala production car, but also date at least back to the '55
Biscayne and the LaSalle II sedan.

I love the Cadet and have always collected whatever I could find on it,
mostly because of the rear engine. It was one of several small car
projects at Styling in '57 that unfortunately never stood a chance for
production in the US.

Dace Newell

---------- Original Message ----------
From: "Gary Swiatowy" <gswiatowy at rochester.rr.com>
To: "Joe Darinsig" <joedarinsig at yahoo.com>, "Dave Newell"
<chevrobilia at juno.com>, <ed.thompson at quarles.com>
Subject: Corvair in print from virtual vairs
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 05:06:22 -0400



From: Bruce Schug <bwschug at att.net>
Subject: <VV> Cadet=Corvair?

The new June issue of "Automobile" has an article about Peter Brock.

In the article, is says that he joined the Design department of GM  
when he was 19. It continues: "An after-hours conversation with design  
legend Harley Earl led to Brock conceptualizing and styling a tiny,  
rear-engine commuter car that would later take larger shape as the  
1960 Corvair."  In a picture it identifies the car as the Cadet and  
says: "Cadet: This GM exercise -- a rear-engine, two-seat 1956 design  
on a 67 inch wheelbase--was green-lighted by design czar Harley Earl  
and later took larger form as the 1960 Corvair."

I am aware of the Cadet.  It does resemble a Corvair with a small  
Corvette-type top.  I did not remember that this turned into the  
Corvair.  Is this generally recognized as being true?

Googleing "1956 gm cadet" brings up a couple of articles, including  
this one that has a picture: http://tinyurl.com/2fyhkvq

None of these articles say the Cadet became the Corvair.  I think the  
truth was that the Corvair was GM's next small car but it didn't  
really evolve from the Cadet.  What do you think?


Bruce




This electronic mail transmission and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged.  
They should be read or retained only by the intended recipient.  If you have received this 
transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the transmission from 
your system.  In addition, in order to comply with Treasury Circular 230, we are required to 
inform you that unless we have specifically stated to the contrary in writing, any advice we 
provide in this email or any attachment concerning federal tax issues or submissions is not 
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, to avoid federal tax penalties.



More information about the VirtualVairs mailing list