<VV> Corvair and Mustang
62vair at gmail.com
Tue Jan 6 15:30:25 EST 2015
I know this a great debate however I have driven both cars and there is no
comparison. My 62 coupe with heavy duty suspension package, 102 - 4 speed
out ran and out maneuvered the early mustangs hands down.
Later, when they went to the bigger engines my 62 still handled better. The
Corvair, for me, is simply a better driving experience.
They are two different classes of car and I would not trade my Corvair for
any of them.
62 Coupe Red/Red
On Jan 6, 2015 12:23 PM, "Jay Maechtlen via VirtualVairs" <
virtualvairs at corvair.org> wrote:
> On 1/6/2015 10:07 AM, frankcb--- via VirtualVairs wrote:
>> Reminds me that on page 26 in the new (February) issue of Popular
>> Mechanics magazine, it states that "independent rear suspension is now
>> standard across the lineup (of Ford cars)". Since some of the Fords now
>> have turbocharging it also says "Turbocharging and independent rear
>> suspension? Is this a Mustang or BMW?" I'm tempted to write them and add
>> "Or a 50 year old Chevrolet CORVAIR like I have sitting in my garage?"
>> Welcome to the modern world, Ford
>> Frank Burkhard
>> Boonton, NJ
> go for it!
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bill H. via VirtualVairs <virtualvairs at corvair.org>
>> To: virtualvairs <virtualvairs at corvair.org>
>> Sent: Tue, Jan 6, 2015 10:51 am
>> Subject: <VV> Corvair and Mustang
> Jay Maechtlen
> '61 2-dr modified w/fiberglass skin,
> transverse 3.8 Buick V6 TH440T4 trans
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are
> the property
> of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:
> vv-help at corvair.org
> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America,
> Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
> Change your options: http://www.vv.corvair.org/
More information about the VirtualVairs