[SCG] 1964 Decklid update
Kent Sullivan
kentsu at corvairkid.com
Mon Oct 31 23:18:02 EST 2005
One more for the crazy list: New clutch/brake pedal assembly and new clutch
cable (Heim joint) for '69 only. Not just that it was the last year or that
only 6000 cars were made but less than 1/2 had manual transmissions!
--Kent
-----Original Message-----
From: scg-list-bounces at tiger.skiblack.com
[mailto:scg-list-bounces at tiger.skiblack.com] On Behalf Of Richard W Thompson
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 6:00 PM
To: Bill Hubbell
Cc: scg-list at tiger.skiblack.com; scg-list-bounces at tiger.skiblack.com
Subject: Re: [SCG] 1964 Decklid update
GM had an internal obligation that they also made to the dealer network that
they would keep certain parts (like sheet metal, emblems, etc.) as active
replacement parts for a minimum of 10-12 years after a model year had ceased
production, That also was a commitment they signed on to their suppliers to
keep tooling active until they gave notification to their suppliers that the
part was discontinued and an order was given to scrap tooling on their
authority. I have that documented (I have seen documents on this) as I
worked for a company that supplied aluminum trim parts for Corvair, Impala,
Chevelle, etc, in the 1960's here in Wisconsin. Other companies had similar
commitments (i.e. Hudson, Nash, AMC, and Chrysler), but Chrysler typically
kept tooling longer than AMC or GM (up to 20 years before giving scrap
orders) but the minium for keeping parts active was
10-12 years for them also. Those timeframes are much shorter now and are
more based on rate of sale and resulting inventory rather than good will
commitments. By the way, that deck lid could be had at your local Chevy
dealer even back in the very early 1980's.
There are many examples I can cite just with Corvairs like this that would
add to questions of why, oh why, would they do that, but simple things the
add of the brake line/brake hose combo on the '69 model, specific to that
year while they were already ready for complete shutdown. They could have
easily used a 60-68 hose. There is no documented reason why that was
changed.
As much as those stamped areas were perforated, that can be the simple
change out of just not having that part of the die perforate in that area.
Additionally, when you add operations for perforating, it just adds to cost.
Yes, they all did some crazy things back then.
"Bill Hubbell"
<wjhubbell at hotmai
l.com> To
Sent by: Richard W Thompson/AE/DuPont at DuPont
scg-list-bounces@ cc
tiger.skiblack.co scg-list at tiger.skiblack.com
m Subject
Re: [SCG] 1964 Decklid update
10/31/2005 06:44
PM
Please respond to
Bill Hubbell
<whubbell at umich.e
du>
Even if that is all so, why, oh why would they make the change only 4-5
months before the entire deck lid was to be scrapped (replaced by LM
design)?!!!
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard W Thompson" <Richard.W.Thompson at usa.dupont.com>
To: "Bill Hubbell" <whubbell at umich.edu>
Cc: <scg-list at tiger.skiblack.com>; <scg-list-bounces at tiger.skiblack.com>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: [SCG] 1964 Decklid update
>
>
>
>
> Since we have no memo from Fisher Body or GM R&D or Engineering to
> point us to why the change happened or exactly when it was to be
> implemented in stamping operations, we are all in the same boat in
> determing the exact when and the why. But I would not be so quick to
> dismiss the thought that I provided as any estimation by any of us
> should be considered as to the when and the why the holes vary in
> number if there can be some sensical things that can be pointed to.
This message was sent by the SCG-list mailing list, all copyrights are the
property of the writer, please attribute properly. For help,
mailto:scg-list-help at corvair.org This list sponsored by the Corvair Society
of America, http://www.corvair.org/ Post messages to:
SCG-list at tiger.skiblack.com Change your options:
http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/scg-list
Get further information about SCG at
http://members.cox.net/whubbell/Stock%20Corvair%20Group/Hello%20to%20all%20n
ew%20and%20prior%20members.htm
This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains
information that may be Privileged, confidential or copyrighted under
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-mail, in
whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by return
e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. Unless explicitly and
conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended", this e-mail does not
constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a
contract offer. This e-mail does not constitute a consent to the use of
sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for transfers
of data to third parties.
Francais Deutsch Italiano Espanol Portugues Japanese Chinese Korean
http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html
This message was sent by the SCG-list mailing list, all copyrights are the
property of the writer, please attribute properly. For help,
mailto:scg-list-help at corvair.org This list sponsored by the Corvair Society
of America, http://www.corvair.org/ Post messages to:
SCG-list at tiger.skiblack.com Change your options:
http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/scg-list
Get further information about SCG at
http://members.cox.net/whubbell/Stock%20Corvair%20Group/Hello%20to%20all%20n
ew%20and%20prior%20members.htm
More information about the SCG-list
mailing list