[SCG] SCG Evaluation

[Larry Claypool]

bill- thanks for putting the group direction back on course.
 i had thought the idea of the event was to observe and document factory 
correct appearence of original cars and details of them, so that we could 
have a record of how things *should* look where a stock restoration is 
desired; and secondarily to "judge"  individual cars that have already been 
reworked or repaired  so the owners might then know the areas on their 
specific car that would have be changed to be 'stock' again. as bill pointed 
out, i don't think the intent was to make a competition  of whose car is 
most stock.
best regards
larry claypool


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Hubbell" <whubbell at cox.net>
To: "P.H. Raker" <n556p at yahoo.com>; <scg-list at tiger.skiblack.com>
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: [SCG] SCG Evaluation


> Paul,
>
> To you and all the others on the general SCG list, I wish to apologize for
> any confusion Mark's e-mail to the list may have generated.  The purpose 
> of
> the Stock Corvair Evaluation is that of a learning tool, to generate
> knowledge for each of us to use as we see fit.  It is not meant in any way
> to be a competitive event, so all this discussion of relative "scores" is
> really inappropriate.  The "scores" as such should have meaning only to 
> the
> owner of the car, and only to the extent he wishes to use them.
>
> Please, let's end this discussion before it goes off into areas we never
> intended the ASCE to go.
>
> Bill Hubbell,
> SCG President