[SCG] [Corsabod] Making stock class,Concours

dal daluckow at aol.com
Sun Sep 6 03:19:11 EDT 2009


I inherited records that were scattered in a box, totally disorganized.  Not sure if this was just a part or supposedly all there.   The records for the last two years since I have started are filed and in fairly good order, including working on a complete master judges list with active participation contacts and email address.  This is a timeless job to do it right.  Bob and Ray were a marvelous team to learn and work under.  I admired and looked forward in helping those two through out their reign. 

Duanne

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 9/5/2009 at 11:38 PM Bill Hubbell wrote:

>This encode
>Tim,
>
>I think you hit the nail on the head about one thing that has NOT been
>done in the past and which SHOULD be done, and that is to maintain a
>running historical record of all official CORSA awards, designations,  etc
>. As you know, I started this thread by researching and then posting a
>record of all Factory Stock cars and owners, plus Preservation awards
>since 1997. Apparently nobody had ever done that before, which makes me
>wonder how the Board or its committees make decisions without good data. 
>
>As I think over some of the Concours questions I have raised in the past I
>wonder how decisions might have been different had anybody kept records
>spanning several years to analyze trends. 
>
>Keeping and compiling information of this sort should be a required
>function of either the Executive Secretary or some other designee of the
>Board.
>
>Bill
>------Original Message------
>From: tim mahler
>To: William J Hubbell
>To: Duanne Luckow
>Cc: CORSA/CPF BoD
>Cc: Stock Corvair Group
>Subject: Re: [Corsabod] [SCG] Making stock class,Concours
>Sent: Sep 5, 2009 7:03 PM
>
>Thanks Bill, Mark, Larry, Kent and others
>
>Duane is the Concours Chairperson.  Let's work with Duane and the 
>Classification Team Leader (Larry Claypool)  to resolve some of the 
>subjectiveness and the leeway proposal (someone has to document, and
>retain, 
>year to year, to prevent the same exceptions from recurring)
>
>The NEW concours classification has been drastically simplified --
>Specialty 
>is gone, Radical is gone.  Modified is gone.
>
>Stcok  (factory, street)
>Improved (all corvairs with non factory stuff,  sprints, yenkos, mag
>wheels, 
>cd radios etc)
>Engineering (Corvair bodied but not powered,  or those Corvair powered but 
>not bodied)
>
>Is that not Mark's -- Stock or not   ???
>
>Sorry the new rules are not posted -- will see If that can be done in the 
>next few days. (it is a holiday weekend)
>
>As to being on the board's agenda?   I think it is WAY too early to be on 
>the board's agenda.  The concours committee, the SCG, and whomever else 
>wants to discuss the topic,  need to further hash things out.  The board 
>would likely muddle things at this point since few of us actually 
>participate in Concours or Judge Concours.  Besides,  I really would like
>to 
>see how the new rules work since a lot of effort and discussion went into 
>those rules.  Improvements to the Stock participation topic may be more 
>procedural then rules.  Or the SCG may be able to help, as I think the SCG 
>has in the last 3 years.  Keep up the discussion.  Some interesting
>thoughts 
>have been made.
>
>Tim mahler




More information about the SCG-list mailing list