<VV> Rocker arm

[Charles Cromwell]

Clark is correct. There is no difference in them.
Chuck

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>






--- Clark Hartzel <chartzel@comcast.net> wrote:

> Previous posts have mentioned that the 140 HP engine
> has a different ratio
> rocker arm than a 110 engine.  Not according to all
> my GM parts books!  For
> unknown reasons to me, the 1969 engine has a
> different part number rocker
> and ball than a 1960-68.  I'll bet the change was in
> the ball as all the
> arms are the same as far as I know.
> Clark Hartzel
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system
> (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.730 / Virus Database: 485 - Release
> Date: 28-Jul-04
> _______________________________________________
> This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing
> list, all copyrights are the property
> of the writer, please attribute properly. For help,
> mailto:vv-help@corvair.org
> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of
> America, http://www.corvair.org/
> Post messages to: VirtualVairs@corvair.org
> List info:
>
http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualvairs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 



		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail