<VV> Interesting Cars (No Corvair)

airvair airvair@richnet.net
Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:18:01 -0400

Ok, so the example was slightly flawed. All I was wanting to point out
was that there have been such posts made where a quick scan of the
message leaves one wondering as to what it's about. At 150 average posts
a day to skim through, I find the lack of ready info slightly annoying.
So all I ask is that such posts be accompanied with a quick description
as to content of the site referenced. Hope that doesn't inconvenience
anyone more than not having the info inconveniences me.

Have a nice day! :o)

YENBAT@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 7/31/04 3:49:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> airvair@richnet.net writes:
> The only thing I'd wish is that people that post things like this would
> at least include even so much as a sentence as to what they want us to
> look at. Maybe it's something that we just don't want to be bothered
> with, but without so much as a hint of what it is, why are we asked to
> take the time and effort? Is that too much to ask?
> -Mark
> The cars....
> That's all.
> Considering the variety there must have been at least one you found
> "interesting" I found
> several.
> Take a look at them and enjoy them OR DON"T
> I'd like to post something that I felt many would enjoy without some wimp a**
> bonehead
> bitching about it.
> Tim Abney