<VV> Rarest Corvair

[WadeHalsey]

Bill Elliott wrote:

>I think those numbers are pretty accurate.
>
>But rarety alone doesn't mean value... though if all were trying to prove is that the Ebay ad is literally incorrect, then it is.
>
>That doesn't change the fact that a '66 turbo vert is worth more than the rarer '69 vert.
>
Could be, but at the Lexington Convention the owner of a rare '69 
claimed that he had been offered (and turned down) 89K for it. That is 
eighty nine thousand just so I'm not misunderstood. Dick Shank and other 
VV ers at Lexington can chime in here----that is what the guy said. 
Anybody want to guess which '69 it was?

Wade Halsey