<VV> <late spoiler>

Roger Gault r.gault@sbcglobal.net
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:36:30 -0600


Now, that's something I hadn't heard.  So, how was the car raised after '65?
Different springs?

Roger Gault
Nice, low '65 in need of rear springs.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <SPYDER62@aol.com>
To: <virtualvairs@corvair.org>
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: <VV> <late spoiler>


> Right the 65 did not have one, all others did. GM did not add them for any
> aero reason but to hide the underbelly after they had to raise the car to
meet
> California headlight laws. The law went into effect in 65 but GM got a one
> year reprieve because the 65 was already designed and in production.