Envy! Re: Why?? Re: <VV> convertible question

[airvair]

Frank,

Thanks, but you'll have to stand in line. It's nice to know that I have 
cars that are desirable. I've had numerous people ask about all three of 
mine at various times. :o)

Like I've said for many years when somebody asked as to why a/c in a 
convert, it's the best of both worlds. You're comfortable no matter what 
the weather is like.

I've found that convertables are really only most comfortable at dusk, 
but that's just my preference. Some people are sun bunnies, and drive 
with the top down any time it's not raining. Even then some of them will 
only try to drive fast. (G)  Even had one couple in my local club show 
up once for a meet in the dead of (Ohio) winter, with the top down, 
heater going full blast. LOL

-Mark C
'67 Monza 4door w/window sticker, loaded
'67 Monza convert w/original top & rear window, loaded
'69 Corsa coupe, loaded

FrankCB@aol.com wrote:

>Mark,
>    A 67 (best year for NON high performance), Convertible (best for driving 
>with top down in mild weather), with AIR CONDITIONING (best for driving in HOT 
>weather) AND LOW mileage as well!!
>    Congratulations and let me know if you ever want to sell it!
>    Frank "green with envy" Burkhard 
>
>In a message dated 2/14/05 1:02:14 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
>airvair@richnet.net writes:
>What I found instead was a '67 (yes!) Monza w/automatic 
>(yes!!) and air conditioning (YES!!!) convertable (DAMN!). But what 
>cinched me buying it, despite it's obvious handicapped body style, was 
>that it was maroon w/black interior, and with only 20,000 dealer's 
>wife's miles on it.