<VV> Defective products

Padgett pp2 at 6007.us
Tue Oct 11 08:49:46 EDT 2005

>It seems to me that naming a vendor who had (at one time or another)
>provided a defective product (most likely manufactured by someone else)
>would fall into the "bashing" area.

To me the important bit is the brand name of the defective product, not the 
vendor who replaced it twice and then had to try to get the cost of both of 
the defective ones back. Sounds like the vendor did the Right Thing in a 
bad situation.


More information about the VirtualVairs mailing list