Fwd: <VV> Lane change feature/Turn Signals Fixed!

airvair airvair at richnet.net
Sat Dec 30 08:16:57 EST 2006


The '67-9 switch DID have that weak point. But you should blame Boyne
for it, who was GM's supplier. I think they must have overlooked that
aspect of the design.

On the other hand, you'd think that after the first one you would know
better. THREE of them? You must be pretty dense. (G)

-Mark

Ron Choy wrote:
> 
> I never did like the 68 onward turn signal. It always felt like it
> was gonna break, but I never knew I wasn't supposed to cancel by
> hand. No one ever told me.  Another undocumented safety feature, I
> guess. It sure didn't take long to break. I must have replaced three
> cancelling cams in the 30 years we had the car. I finally gave up and
> held the stick in place.  The lane change feature is just barely ok.
> I prefer the durability of the 65-66-? switch.
> "GM Mark of Excellence? Humph! -ron 65,66
>



More information about the VirtualVairs mailing list