<VV> multigrade oils..

Bill Elliott corvair at fnader.com
Mon Oct 2 21:24:58 EDT 2006


I'm having difficulty reading your coded emails. ;-)

Are you trying to say that a 5W-50 will be burned at a higher rate than 
a straight 50 weight? Or that the cold viscosity changes with age more 
quickly than the hot viscosity? Or that an engine will burn or leak a 20 
weight oil more quickly than it will a 50 weight?

I can agree with just one of those.

Bill

TimogensTurbo at aol.com wrote:

>In a message dated 10/2/2006 3:28:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
>corvair at fnader.com writes:
>
>  
>
>>Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying... a 0W-50 should be exactly the 
>>same as a straight 50 weight when hot...
>>
>>    
>>
>===================================================
>
>May or may not be........BUT   the "0"-xxx    will go away  WAY faster... 
>then  50 wt.
>
>I've had soooo many "worn" engines ... that a  weight change let's them run 
>smokless for another 100,000..
>
>2 Vairs I've had  used   60wt  in SoCal.....no oil added in 20,000 miles of  
>commuting...but were smokers, oil eaters before I  got them!
>
>
>  
>


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.11/460 - Release Date: 10/1/2006



More information about the VirtualVairs mailing list