<VV> RE: [fastvair] Re: Performance Corvair Group

[Kent Sullivan]

Can someone please explain to me why a cheap shot at the Stock Corvair Group
was thought to be a good idea, even if tongue-in-cheek? I happen to own a
very stock Corvair and a very modified Corvair. I enjoy both equally, for
very different reasons. I don't see the need for one group to be poking at
the other given that there is already some ill-will between the two groups.

 

Thanks.

 

From: fastvair at yahoogroups.com [mailto:fastvair at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Stan East
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 7:45 PM
To: fastvair at yahoogroups.com
Cc: virtualvairs at corvair.org
Subject: [fastvair] Re: Performance Corvair Group

 

aeroned at aol.com <mailto:aeroned%40aol.com>  wrote:

The reason we went with Performance Corvair Group was a bit of tongue in 
cheek shot at the Stock Corvair Group....

Careful now Mr Windtunnel.....

My Corvairs include a 66 Corsa with Factory A/C (intended to eventually be
restored and entered in Concours). The other is my former ice racer a 66 500
with full roll cage to be rebuilt as a Yenko clone.



<snip>