<VV> 95HP heads

[shortle]

Wow! Now I am confused. Is there any value AT ALL for my 1969 flat chamber heads (they look like late turbo heads)? Although my Rampside will be getting the 1965 95HP heads, I still am intrigued with the 69's. If my memory is correct,they had flat pistons.                                                      wer

-----Original Message-----
>From: Sethracer at aol.com
>Sent: Nov 13, 2007 4:39 PM
>To: hyarnell1 at earthlink.net, dziegler3 at comcast.net, chartzel at comcast.net
>Cc: virtualvairs at corvair.org
>Subject: Re: <VV> 95HP heads
>
> 
>In a message dated 11/13/2007 2:05:04 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
>hyarnell1 at earthlink.net writes:
>
>...and  to muddy the waters even further, late heads have a different bore 
>for the  cylinder. I have some specs somwhere (of course I can't find them) 
>that  early heads won't fit late jugs, and late heads are 'loose' on early 
>jugs;  or the other way around...
>
>harry yarnell
>
>
>
>Except that the "early" pistons he was referring to were the flat-top 1965  
>and most 66. Those and the late open-chamber head would be about 7 to 1  
>compression. If you used 1963 displacement, with (appropriately shimmed) later  open 
>chamber heads - you would be even lower.  A bonus, though, you could  
>probably start the car with a coiled rope! <grin> -  Seth
>
>
>
>************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
> _______________________________________________
>This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are the property
>of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:vv-help at corvair.org
>This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America, http://www.corvair.org/
>Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
>Change your options: http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs 
> _______________________________________________