<VV> Subject: I want Compression!
Mikeamauro at aol.com
Mikeamauro at aol.com
Fri Dec 26 00:21:58 EST 2008
Seth has covered, very well, methods to increase compression ratio. Whatever
method used, don't forget to address the quench distance: as "born," in
engines I've examined prior to rebuild, stock Corvair quench distances exceeded
.050. With today's pump gas (even 93 octane premium), anything more than .040
does little to attenuate detonation. I'm presently running two 110s, quite
successfully, with .032 quench distances. As both are on air conditioned,
powerglide vehicles, I choose to stay near stock compression ratio (.25 over at
9.5:1). Prior to adjusting the quench distance, neither vehicle, no matter how
much I fussed with the timing, would operate in warm weather without knock.
Adjusting the quench space can be accomplished in two ways: cut out the step
in the cylinder head (then take out material in the head and from the top of
forged pistons (opposite the quench area) to get back to the desired chamber
volume); or, weld in new material into the head in the quench area and
machine to desired height (as I recall, this also required adding and resurfacing
the gasket surface, a bit, too)... then remove material away from the quench
area to get back to the desired C.C. volume. Both engines have been together
and running for several years, now, and the details are a little fuzzy, but
the welded up heads would be my choice if/when done again. As Seth mentioned,
no matter what, check and correct valve train geometry. I've also noticed,
even though the available roller rockers are supposed to be the correct ratio to
replace stock rockers, geometry changes a bit when using roller rockers. You
might also seriously consider employing a Safeguard knock control system.
Mike Mauro
**************Don't be the last to know - click here for the latest news that
will have people talking. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000021)
More information about the VirtualVairs
mailing list