<VV> Terminal block, Not a: HRPT

[Mark Corbin]

Here we are again, Roberts. Back again at the same old issue. Ralphy complained that the EM's swing axle design was a "bad design", and that the proof of that was the upgrade in the late model's suspension. You are using the same logic, that a later improvement proves that the earlier design is defective. Under that logic, Corvairs themselves are defective, in so many ways, simply because automotive technology has surpassed Corvairs in many areas. Viton is just one of them.

No, it's your logic that is faulty. Not the OEM late model terminal block.

-Mark


----- Original Message ----- 
From: 
To: airvair at earthlink.net;NicolCS at aol.com;virtualvairs at corvair.org
Sent: 3/7/2008 10:21:35 AM 
Subject: Re: Terminal block, Not a: HRPT


Again, something that on a LOT of other cars, lasts forever. Bad design. Sorry, those are the facts of the matter. After all, the pushrod tube Orings are a lousy design as well, right? And who in their right mind would replace these with OE style Orings? I wouldn't. Viton fixes the problem longer than the heads will stay on the engine! 

In a message dated 3/7/2008 10:10:03 AM Eastern Standard Time, airvair at earthlink.net writes:
Maintainence would include replacing it when it deteriorates. After all, when something deteriorates doesn't it need maintainence, by definition? So if the terminal block is deteriorated, damaged, doesn't function as intended, etc., isn't that by definition needing maintainence?

-Mark


----- Original Message ----- 
From: 
To: airvair at earthlink.net;NicolCS at aol.com;virtualvairs at corvair.org
Sent: 3/6/2008 12:32:40 PM 
Subject: Re: Terminal block, Not a: HRPT


It's OK, you can call me John! :)

So, what sort of maintenance is required on a terminal block?