<VV> NOM

[J. R. Read]

We are in agreement!  <BIG GRIN>
Later, JR

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "BBRT" <chsadek at comcast.net>
To: "J. R. Read" <hmlinc at sbcglobal.net>; "Brent Fullard" 
<brent.fullard at rogers.com>; "Joe Lewis" <joelewis33 at cox.net>; 
<virtualvairs at corvair.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: <VV> NOM


> Yes and yes. [To someone who cares....]     ;>)
>
> Seriously, I think a truck motor in a truck is more valuable and better 
> than a car motor in a truck.
>
> Chuck S
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "J. R. Read" <hmlinc at sbcglobal.net>
>
>
>>I intend to be putting a Non Original Motor into my '61 Rampside within 
>>the
>> next month or two.  It is a '64 (110) truck motor and will be replacing 
>> the
>> '67 car motor that is currently in the truck.  So, will this be LESS Non
>> Original and therefore make the truck worth more?
>>
> 


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com