<VV> So, '65 3-speed is non-synchro, but '66-'69 is synchro (like I said?)

[Frank DuVal]

Yes, I've driven many a 65 convertible with 3 speed! I guess they wanted 
the cheapest convertible they could order. Not only is it hard to avoid 
backing up taking off from the light (Ha!) it crunches going in to first 
(second if you forget Ha!). After all, your hand thinks you are driving 
a four speed....

I'll buy you one the next time you are in Virginia.

Frank DuVal

On 4/8/2015 11:25 PM, Charlie wrote:
> So, I was right all along, and I win that bet?
>
> Check out this thread, and I believe it was I (that would be me ;>~}?) that
> first said that '65 3-speeds differed from '66 to '69?
>
> If I recall this thread correctly, just about everyone disagreed with me?
>
> It makes sense now, in the context of '65 sharing transmissions with '64, if
> I have that correct?
>
> So, who buys who (me) a beer?
>
> Charlie