Fwd: <VV> "FNADER" is disrespectful

[ScottyGrover at aol.com]

In a message dated 8/16/2006 4:14:30 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
corvair2 at earthlink.net writes:

Group:

Yes I am Canadian and I think I can make a generalization  that sometimes 
Canadians are more timid in their approach when compared with  Americans. This is 
not necessarily bad, but there is a  difference.

Although I might have some serious issues with what Mr.  Nadar had to say 
about one of my favorite automobiles, I think that it is very  disrespectful to 
crucify his opinion on my license plate or in any other form  of public 
communication. 

I and many of my Countrymen will not  persecute anyone for having a different 
opinion than ours.

It's not  that is not you do not have the right to voice your opinion, (many 
Veterans  have served us and the Country to give us this right) but some such 
as I might  take the position that Mr. Nadar actually did us a favor by making 
our  favorite car more affordable to buy. 

Some might even argue that he -  Connecticut’s own Ralph Nadar - forced the 
largest automaker in the world to  review their investment in making the 
automobile safer instead of just taking  the money to the bank.

Flame on...

Respectfully,  Garth






Garth, With some of us, it's not a matter of a difference of opinion, it's  
that Mr. Nader was trying to get legislation enacted to hamper the auto  
companies in doing their business and didn't at all mind stretching or  distorting 
the truth to do so.  Those of us who were "car freaks" or  otherwise familiar 
with the auto industry didn't like this malicious distortion  of the truth and 
as a matter of fact, reading his book caused me to try  out  the Corvair just 
to find the truth. The next car I bought was a  Corvair--and it's still in my 
driveway.
Scotty