<VV> What's The Difference

BobHelt at aol.com BobHelt at aol.com
Wed Jul 11 19:27:22 EDT 2007


 
In a message dated 7/11/2007 3:30:06 PM US Mountain Standard Time,  
hmlinc at sbcglobal.net writes:

Hi  Bob,  Don't know if this impacts, but the '60 cylinder bore (stock) was  
3.375" while the '61 - '63 bore was 3.4375".  So, besides head and  carb 
differences - the bore could also play a role in the advertised  HP?



Hi JR,
His question concerned only the differences between the 98 and 102 HP  
engines, not the 95 engine, a strictly 1960 engine! 
 
So that means any bore size differences from 1960 to 61 are irrelevant. The  
98 engine was strictly a 1961 engine while the 102 was 1962-63. No 1960 
engines  were included in his question.
Regards,
Bob Helt



************************************** Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour


More information about the VirtualVairs mailing list