<VV> Paint, was: Comments to the Virginia DMV (humor) and the ForbiddenMentionof painting

[Jay Pitchford]

"reactive, isocyanate containing polymer". Eeek . . . my head hurts just
reading that. Mommy, I need a cocktail.

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Harry Yarnell <hyarnell1 at earthlink.net>wrote:

> Not knowing what 'surface energy' is, I figured that the relative roughness
> of the lacquer was enough 'tooth' for the Imron topcoat.
> On another note, I painted (and still own) a '65 Corsa that I painted in an
> Art Artzburger paint scheme (stripes on the engine and trunk lids) with a
> black body; all in Dupont lacquer. Clearcoated in Imron.
> This was maybe 25 years ago. Still looks beautiful.
>
> Harry Yarnell
> Perryman garage and orphanage
> Perryman, MD
> hyarnell1 at earthlink.net
>  ----- Original Message -----
>   From: jvhroberts at aol.com
>  To: hyarnell1 at earthlink.net ; airvair at earthlink.net ;
> tony.underwood at cox.net ; yenko117 at yahoo.com
>  Cc: virtualvairs at corvair.org
>   Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 2:11 PM
>  Subject: Re: <VV> Paint, was: Comments to the Virginia DMV (humor) and the
> ForbiddenMentionof painting
>
>
>   Indeed, Harry! Imron requires the correct base to adhere to. Given that
> it IS a reactive, isocyanate containing polymer, it needs a surface with
> both active hydrogen groups AND reasonable surface energy. Neither acrylic
> or nitrocellulose lacquers meet these needs. Now, if you did Imron over
> Imron, life would be SWEET!
>
>
>
>  John Roberts
>
>  _______________________________________________
> This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are
> the property
> of the writer, please attribute properly. For help, mailto:
> vv-help at corvair.org
> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of America,
> http://www.corvair.org/
> Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
> Change your options:
> http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
>  _______________________________________________
>