<VV> Abomination, was: Oh say can you see

[airvair at earthlink.net]

I don't EVEN want to think about that. That despite some who actually HAVE
stuck engines into the front of a Corvair, then tried to pawn them of as
Corvairs. Sorry, what they have are Camaros (or something else, like a Jag)
with a Corvair body shell, but absolutely NOT a Corvair! I don't care what
they say. 

A "front-engine Corvair"? That's a contradiction in terms.

-Mark

> [Original Message]
> From: Charles Lee <Chaz at ProperProPer.com>
> Subject: Re: Oh say can you see, was: <VV> Modern Corvair vs. mundane FWDs
>
> ... and even a much worse fate : a front engine !  Please, No-o-o-o-o ....
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <airvair at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Oh say can you see, was: <VV> Modern Corvair vs. mundane FWDs
>
> >I wonder if they would do a "retro" Corvair the same way they did the new
> > "retro" Camaro. It's got a great modern "retro" revision of the '69 
> > Camaro,
> > but it's a sedan. The original was a hardtop. Fact is, that is my
biggest
> > complaint about it, the Challenger, and even the Mustang. They're ALL
> > sedans, not hardtops. The LM Corvairs were beautiful as hardtops, and to
> > make them into sedans would ruin them.
> >
> > -Mark
> >