<VV> [fastvair] Fwd: fans and such

[jvhroberts at aol.com]

 I was using for an engineering comparison. So, that DESIGN is the right approach. 

And, the Porsche design is SERIOUSLY proven. Has anyone seen data on Tom's fan? Has it been built, run, and tested?

 

John Roberts
 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: BBRT <chsadek at comcast.net>
To: fastvair at yahoogroups.com; virtualvairs at corvair.org
Sent: Sun, Mar 28, 2010 11:37 am
Subject: Re: [fastvair] Fwd: fans and such


  
                  
Seems to me, instead of touting the Porch fan, you ought to tout Tom 
Knoblauch's fan which rotates in the correct direction.

Chuck S
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <JVHRoberts at aol.com>

> But if the fan was truly an efficient design, there may not be a drive 
> problem whatsoever! Not to beat a dead horse, but 911 fans move more air, 
> develop more pressure, and consume a LOT less HP than the Corvair unit. 
> And in that, I believe, is where the right approach lays.
>
>
>
> John Roberts


    
         
__._,_.___
                 
      
              Reply to sender |              Reply to group |              Reply via web post |                Start a New Topic      
                Messages in this topic          (3)          
 
      Recent Activity:                      New Members      3                        New Photos      5                                                
    Visit Your Group  
      
      
homepage http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fastvair "sign in" at upper right of page for archives, edit your membership(digest,unsubscribe)
Post message: fastvair at yahoogroups.com 

      
  
  
  
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

 
     
   
.
   

__,_._,___