<VV> Being concise on VV? What fun would that be?!?!?!?

[Charlie]

The problem with being concise is we would have to try harder to argue about
it!

The whole '65 vs. '66 synchro thread would have ended before it began!!!

What fun would that be?!?!?!?

Charlie


-----Original Message-----
From: VirtualVairs [mailto:virtualvairs-bounces at corvair.org] On Behalf Of
John Roberts via VirtualVairs
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:00 AM
To: shortle556 at earthlink.net; corvairduval at cox.net; virtualvairs at corvair.org
Subject: Re: <VV> '65 3-speed is non-synchro, but '66-'69 is synchro?


OK, let's nutshell this:
60-65 3 speeds had non syncro first gears. 66-69 3 speeds were syncro in all
forward gears. 
All 4 speeds are syncro on all forward gears. 
No manual had syncro reverse gears.
Howzat?
 
John Roberts
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: shortle via VirtualVairs <virtualvairs at corvair.org>
To: Frank DuVal <corvairduval at cox.net>; virtualvairs
<virtualvairs at corvair.org>
Sent: Thu, Apr 9, 2015 9:40 am
Subject: Re: <VV> '65 3-speed is non-synchro, but '66-'69 is synchro?


Sorry Frank. You are wrong (finally!). "option wise" sinks your answer. The
fully synchronized 3 speed in '66 was NOT an option.
Charlie: you are right.
Always. Come to Durango for our tri state meet net month and I will buy you
a beer. 1. 
Timothy Shortle in Durango Colorado 81301


 
 _______________________________________________
This message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are
the property of the writer, please attribute properly. For help,
mailto:vv-help at corvair.org This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of
America, http://www.corvair.org/ Post messages to: VirtualVairs at corvair.org
Change your options: http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
 _______________________________________________