<VV> Display cars at Knoxville

Sethracer at aol.com Sethracer at aol.com
Tue Jun 30 20:23:04 EDT 2015


Bill wrote:
"Let me set the record straight and end this discussion.  I am the one  
upset about this.  I am the one making a fuss about it." 
 
So I write:
The person who lights the fire is not necessarily the one who gets to  put 
it out.
 
"Corsa" has proven, in the past, to be perfectly capable of displaying  
special cars for Convention goers. In Detroit, they had a 1960 and a 1969 on  
display at the end of the lobby, just outside the vendor area. In Sturbridge, 
a  couple of race cars were displayed in the center of the vendor area. 
Last  year, in Tacoma, Herb Berkman's (ex-car) was on display in the lobby of 
the  hotel. These are just three examples at three conventions. This pretty 
coupe  could have been displayed in the lobby of the hotel all week, or while 
the owner  permitted it. That would have been a public display area for all 
to see. The  Concours is a "Convention venue" and not technically open to 
the public. That  the car was subjected to classification at all is a 
mystery. There was no reason  to have the car in the competitive arena of the 
Concours. The Stock Corvair  group could have done their honest evaluation for 
the owner during the hotel  display. Was the reason that only with a Concours 
entry could a "Classification"  be performed?. It seems that the owner had 
no interest in that. As the  owner/maintainer of this essentially new car, he 
knew of the stockness of the  car, but he had no idea that Corsa had a 
rule-set developed over many years and  iterations. That rule set was designed, 
and modified to provide guidelines for  folks "wanting" to compete for 
cleanliness and preparation levels. It is a  service that Corsa provides to 
interested owners who want to display as  "correct" a car as they want to 
display. With the classification completed, the  owner can than decide whether to 
go back and shoot for some other level or not.  The Corsa Concours committee 
(like all volunteer committees) has, in the  past, been criticized for not 
being even-handed, allowing an exception  here, or making a scoring mistake 
there. This decision was right by the rules.  But it should not have had to 
be made at all. 
 
I have attended every Corsa Convention since 1980. I have entered  a car in 
the Concours competition whenever I brought one. I had a  car promoted into 
senior division, then repeat 3 years later. But I have also  brought race 
cars and entered them in Concours as well, with no  expectation of earning 
anything. But I do gain an evaluation of condition!
 
So now what? First, criticism of either the classification procedure  or 
the decision to not grant a waiver is useless. It wasn't and isn't a policy  
of Corsa to ignore or belittle this car. It was what it was. Classification  
is a service of Corsa, and need not be experienced, unless desired. Other 
than  the split between regular and Senior class, the "classification" serves 
to  provide the layout of the cars on the field. That could easily be done 
in the  same way as the car display cars are arranged. Each car is 
individually judged  against that "mythical" 100 point car, not against other cars on 
the field.  "Stockish" car owners wanting to compete for a preservation 
award could so  indicate on their car. If the judges deem them worthy, great.
 
Changes? - well, display cars should be invited and treated as display  
cars. It might require some more coordination between the host  
chapter/organizers and whoever is working with the hotel and venue. Anybody  who enters any 
of the events should know what is expected of them, and what  to expect. 
 
- Seth Emerson
       
 
 
In a message dated 6/24/2015 6:18:22 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
virtualvairs at corvair.org writes:

Let me  set the record straight and end this discussion.  I am the one 
upset  about this.  I am the one making a fuss about it. 

The owner was  asked by convention organizers to bring the car here (from 
Arizona), to show  it at Concours, having been highly profiled in both 
national and CORSA  publications.  He did not seek to come here or to designate 
the car as  anything in particular.  He did not buy this car to bring it here 
and win  an award. 

The provenance of this car is a matter of public record and  is 
indisputable. The fact that it is essentially a 52 year old "new" car is  not in doubt. 
 The condition of the car is amazing.  It offers a  rare chance to look 
back 52 years in time to see how a car came from the  factory - imperfections 
and all.  The knowledge it can contribute to  those few of us who have an 
interest in originality is a rare gift.  

Frankly, the owner is not nearly so upset about this as I am.   Once again 
CORSA has demonstrated their failure to have a venue to recognize  
preservation of originality.

The fact is, the only official recognition  given by CORSA to original 
vehicles is the presentation of a Preservation  Award, given to the vehicle(s) 
with the high score in either (or both) Stock  classes (original or 
restored).  However, a car has no chance of  competing for such award unless it can 
successfully run the gauntlet of  classification, with all its arcane rules. 

Last time I checked,  Corvairs were not delivered from the factory with 
Coker tires, aftermarket  splatter paint (which looks nothing like the 
original), reproduction  weatherstripping that doesn't seal or fit right, or 
reproduction batteries  that are not "tar top"; yet all of these "modifications" 
are permitted under  current CORSA stock classification rules.  Factory Stock 
Restored  vehicles can even be completely stripped and repainted. 

The fact that  a car "fresh" from the showroom floor, but 52 years late 
being delivered,  might need new tires, (or filters, battery, or even shocks, 
brakes, etc), is  not surprising and should not reduce its value as an 
otherwise original  car.  It should be possible to see past those imperfections to 
note the  value of the rest of the car. 

Here is a car where you can see original  paint, original upholstery, 
original hardware, original overspray, original  exhaust system, original tire 
(yes, the spare) - all in pristine, UNRESTORED  condition. 

To fail to recognize this car as something special - that  is the point.  
It defines our club as one that doesn't care about such  things. 

Instead, we will recognize those who over-restore,  over-polish, and 
replace old, original parts that could have been preserved  with new, imperfect 
reproductions and we will call them "winners".   

We will celebrate the cars that drive the fastest, get the best  mileage, 
navigate tricky courses, have the hardest luck. 

We won't,  however, recognize and celebrate our heritage - not even when it 
is staring us  in the face.

Bill Hubbell
President, Stock Corvair Group, and one of  a few remaining CORSA members 
who "give a damn" about preserving and  recognizing originality. 

On Jun 24, 2015, at 7:20 AM, Bruce Schug via  Chapters 
<chapters at corvair.org> wrote:

Would someone report  exactly what tires did this car have? I know the 
rules in some classes are  incorrect, requiring 175/80s when 185/80s should be 
required, but if the owner  wanted to present the car as original, he clearly 
should have read the rules  over and over and contacted the Concours Chair 
about any questions. The  solution for him would seem to have been a set of 
Coker's reproduced bias ply  6.50-13s.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 23, 2015, at 10:50 PM,  David Clamp via VirtualVairs 
<virtualvairs at corvair.org> wrote:
>  
> I saw the progress this car made from filthy to factory perfect on  the 
web.  Truly amazing to have a factory brand new 52 year old  car.  To deny 
this car its proper place is utterly ridiculous. I have  usually defended 
CORSA in the past and encouraged people to join, but it is  things like this 
that drive people away.  CORSA wonders why membership is  shrinking.  Stupid 
stuff like this is part of the problem. Sticking to  the letter of the law?  
It's a car event, not a religion. 
>  
> David
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Jun  23, 2015, at 10:26 PM, Ned Madsen via Chapters 
<chapters at corvair.org>  wrote:
>> 
>> Couldn't agree more... CORSA is  insane!!
>> 
>> 
>> But that's nothing  new.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original  Message-----
>> From: Bill Hubbell via Chapters  <chapters at corvair.org>
>> To: Virtual Vairs  <virtualvairs at corvair.org>; CORSA/CPF BoD 
<corsabod at corvair.org>;  Corsa Chapters <chapters at corvair.org>
>> Sent: Tue, Jun 23,  2015 4:31 pm
>> Subject: <CORSA Chapters> CORSA  blunder
>> 
>> 
>> I've never been more embarrassed  by this club that by what just 
happened today. 
>> The '63 White  Monza Lambrecht car was classified into the Modified 
class for
>>  Concours - technically correct due to the incorrect size of his 
whitewall  radial
>> tires, but grossly incorrect for what is probably the last  most perfect 
factory
>> original car we will ever see again.   Mark Corbin and I made a personal 
appeal
>> to the Concours chair to  - just this one time - override the rule book 
and give
>> this car  the recognition it deserves, but he stood on the letter of the 
law  and
>> refused to reconsider. 
>> 
>> Well, he does  have the original Firestone 6.50-13
>> tire in the spare location,  complete with the two felt pads protecting 
the metal
>> underneath,  the molding plugs unmolested.  All the rubber moldings, 
bumpers,  etc
>> are in pristine, soft condition, the metal trim shiny bright,  even has 
the drips
>> and droops of glue and goop where the factory  left them.  
>> 
>> You will never see
>> a  car in more original and new condition as this one.  To call it  
modified
>> because he didn't drive it here on 52 year old bias belt  tires is 
insane. 
>> 
>> 
>> CORSA is  insane.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  Bill
>> _______________________________________________
>>  Chapters mailing
>> list
>> Chapters at corvair.org
>>  http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/listinfo/chapters
>>  List
>> use help, chapters-help at corvair.org
>> 
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>>  Chapters mailing list
>> Chapters at corvair.org
>>  http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/listinfo/chapters
>> List use help,  chapters-help at corvair.org
>  _______________________________________________
> This message was sent  by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights 
are the property
> of  the writer, please attribute properly. For help,  mailto:vv-help
@corvair.org
> This list sponsored by the Corvair Society  of America, 
http://www.corvair.org/
> Post messages to:  VirtualVairs at corvair.org
> Change your options:  
http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
>  _______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Chapters  mailing  list
Chapters at corvair.org
http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/listinfo/chapters
List  use help,  chapters-help at corvair.org
_______________________________________________
This  message was sent by the VirtualVairs mailing list, all copyrights are 
the  property
of the writer, please attribute properly. For help,  
mailto:vv-help at corvair.org
This list sponsored by the Corvair Society of  America, 
http://www.corvair.org/
Post messages to:  VirtualVairs at corvair.org
Change your options:  http://www.vv.corvair.org/mailman/options/virtualvairs
_______________________________________________



More information about the VirtualVairs mailing list