<VV> VV email server compliance (difficult) and proposal(easier ?) :

[Charles Lee]

Yes, the sender may (usually) change where addresses are.
This still requires "Reply to all" to manipulate things so that "VV" is the 
target of your response.

This makes it more difficult to comply with VV's dictates, right ?

So, no matter what the sender does, VV's server can/could/should modify mail 
to put "VV" in "To" and the sender's address in "CC" ?

That way, "Reply" (and not "Reply to all") will be the correct action ALL 
the time, to comply with VV ?

That's the essence of my proposal...

Charlie


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J R Read_HML" <hmlinc at sbcglobal.net>
To: "Charles Lee" <Chaz at ProperProper.com>; "Vair Club" 
<VirtualVairs at corvair.org>
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: <VV> VV email server compliance (difficult) and proposal(easier 
?) :


> Charlie,
>
> I just hit REPLY ALL to your message.  Your name and "Vair Club" (probably 
> from your address book) appeared in the To: line.  I could have deleted 
> your name, but did not.  So, you will receive 2 emails on this - one 
> direct from me and the other through the VV server.
>
> The only time VV is in the CC: line is when the original sender put it 
> there.
>
> Later, JR
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Charles Lee" <Chaz at ProperProper.com>
> To: "Vair Club" <VirtualVairs at corvair.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 6:02 PM
> Subject: Re: <VV> VV email server compliance (difficult) and 
> proposal(easier ?) :
>
>
>> I've received a lot of flack about "Replying" to individuals and not JUST 
>> to
>
> BIG CUT HERE
>
>>
>> Thank you for your support !
>> Charlie
>>
>
>